Feedback : MLR Writing session at Matrix Chambers - 30/03/11
Held at Matrix chambers
Feedback from participants ;
Best bit
“Report prepared by chartered clinical Pychologist and discussion of topics”
”Question & Answer session”
“Open discussion”
“Discussion with “experts” and colleagues”
“The advice !”
“Format excellent”
“Chance to meet other psychiatrists working in this area”
“Advice from practising lawyers – access to their experience”
“I liked the format and a lot of questions were answered very informatively”
“Q&A session”
Worst bit
“None”
“5.30pm is tight arrival time after work !”
“Nothing”
“Finding the place + you’re not very visually impared friendly”
“Could get a bit too jumpy – topic to topic”
“Difficult to hear”
Questions you would have like to have been covered
“What to say under opinion and Conclusion to make it punchy”
“One left over from last time – how to comment on consistency of non physical findings”
“Had opportunity to ask what I wanted to ask”
“The point about citing references”
“Not all submitted questions were dealt with e.g. “Advocay””
Suggestions for future training
“More on credibility and inconsistencies”
“More please”
“Please hold regular sessions – really useful”
“Hopefully the references discussed will be circulated”
“Ask doctors to produce vignettes / case examples of problems with reports”
“Use the same format”
“More sessions like this but perhaps more focused on “themes””
Any additional info about yourself / what you are interested in
“None”
”Secret evidence used in deportation – would like this issue to be taken up”
“More information about relevant articles / case-law online”
